My rating: 4 of 5 stars
It always seems like an accomplishment when I finish a non-fiction book, but this one was well worth the seven weeks it took to read it. Ethnic America has some very interesting insights. Sowell analyzes several ethnic groups (Chinese, Japanese, Irish, Italian, African, Mexican, Puerto Rican, German, Jews--each group gets its own chapter) that have immigrated to the United States at various times. He discusses their background in their homeland and reasons for emigrating, how they fared and what their occupations were once they came here, and how their children, and then grandchildren, fared. If you want to understand issues like immigration, discrimination, and affirmative action better, this is a good read. It was written in the 1980s, so it is a little out of date, but I was still able to learn a lot from it.
Here are some of the things that stuck out to me as I was reading:
(I think this was meant to be Sowell's thesis, although he didn't do a great job of making it clear.) When we see inequality of income when comparing different ethnic groups, our society tends to immediately point to racism and discrimination as the cause. But often the differences have more to do with factors like the region the ethnic group tends to live in, cultural differences, or average age of the ethnic group--and people who point this out are discounted and called racists! For example, if you look at national averages, African Americans have lower incomes than the national average. But if you compare incomes in specific regions, African American incomes are similar to those of others in the same region. Sowell says that African American incomes are lower than the national average because they are concentrated in the South, where income is lower for most people than the national average. So they have lower incomes because they live in a poorer region, and not necessarily because of discrimination. It's rather unfortunate that the default is to point to racism because it can prevent the real problem from being addressed, and it creates contention unnecessarily.
Most of the immigrant groups had a difficult time at first. The incomes of the first generation tended to be low, and often they had bad living conditions. The second generation tended to do a little better, and by the third or fourth generation most groups seem to have reached the national average for income. When children were allowed and encouraged to attend public school, it was beneficial for the immigrants because the children learned English and American customs and policies there, and were therefore able to help their parents to become more acculturated as well. The Chinese had a very difficult time because there were so many single men or men who had left their families behind in China, and then immigration policies prevented more Chinese from coming to the United States, which meant that for a long time there was no second generation to help the first generation immigrants adjust to American culture.
It seems to me that it is worth it to invest in helping immigrants become acculturated, especially to help them learn English and teach their children. In the past, policies that have discriminated against immigrant groups (for example, the Chinese) prevented them from adjusting and thriving in the United States, which led to disease and violence. In the long run, helping them adjust is less costly because they can then contribute to our society.
I think it is important for the United States to enable people to immigrate here legally. Right now the process for doing so is very difficult, and nearly impossible for people who are poor and barely literate (Ryan's advisor from Germany said it was easier to apply to graduate school than it was to apply for a green card--and if that's what a professor thinks, how easy do you think it is for someone with very little education?). Yes, initially it can be a little costly because of ESL programs and such, but in general the ethnic groups that Sowell talked about adjusted to American life with in a couple of generations, and mainly this was accomplished through their own hard work and the things their children learned in public school. We also benefit from the influence of other cultures. For example, one of the most important contributions that the Germans made was to show other [very Puritanical] Americans that there is no harm in good, clean fun. They came with a love of sports, music, dancing, and other entertainment and helped other Americans to enjoy that too. I think we would be a very different place without that influence.
Conditions in the immigrants' country of origin played a huge role in how they lived after coming to the United States. The Irish had been suppressed by England for so long that they learned how to develop their own groups to support different causes, which is why they were so good at building up the political machines in the United States. The Italians were suppressed too, but it was different because they lived in small villages that were basically run by one rich person who could do whatever he wanted to the poor villagers, so the Italians learned to be most loyal to their family and close friends, which meant that in the United States they weren't as inclined to start larger groups for Italians in general as the Irish had been. Both the Irish and Italians lacked a desire to "go the extra mile" because in their country of origin it could actually do more harm than good to work harder than you had to, which in some ways inhibited their ability in the United States to move upward. Cultural characteristics like these could persist for several generations.
View all my reviews